Lyndon Nixon, Valentina Presutti, Célian Ringwald, Andrea Schimmenti · arXiv (Cornell University) 2026 · 2026
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2609.07695
Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).
Using Knowledge Graphs (KGs) to describe Cultural Heritage Objects (CHOs) supports semantic richness and interoperability. However, standard KGs fail to capture the context-dependent validity of statements. This limitation is critical for cultural heritage metadata, which must often accommodate evolving or conflicting viewpoints, such as colonial versus post-colonial perspectives or shifting scientific consensus. While current knowledge representation methods address basic contextualization via provenance, qualifiers or reification, they lack a unified framework to simultaneously model and query data across multiple social, cultural, and political dimensions. To bridge this gap, we introduce the conceptual foundations of Multi-dimensional Knowledge Graphs (MKGs) and discuss how they preserve complex, multi-layered contexts in CHO metadata.
No comments yet — start the discussion below.