Jun Liu, Chris Nugent, Dehu Yu, Lixian Xu, Muhammad Asim Ali, Xinlei Cao, Long-Hao Yang, Xia Wang · International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 2026 · 2026
DOI: 10.1007/s44196-026-01529-z
Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).
Agentic AI based on large language models (LLMs) is rapidly evolving from static chatbots to autonomous systems that plan, act, and interact with tools in open-ended environments. However, current LLM agents lack calibrated uncertainty, robust safety mechanisms, and faithful explanations, making them ill-suited for safety-critical settings such as healthcare, finance, cybersecurity, and industrial operations. Extended Belief Rule Bases (EBRB) are representative examples of interpretable, rule-based probabilistic reasoning frameworks with explicit representation of belief and ignorance, and have been successfully applied in complex decision problems without suffering from the rule explosion that affects traditional rule-based approaches. This position paper argues that EBRB could serve as a core safety and reasoning governor within LLM-based agentic pipelines, yielding hybrid systems to better align agentic AI systems with emerging regulatory and ethical requirements for Trustworthy AI (TAI) in high-risk settings. We outline: (i) a conceptual architecture integrating LLMs with EBRB in agentic workflows; (ii) the mapping from this architecture to TAI dimensions including transparency, uncertainty, safety, fairness, and auditability; (iii) concrete opportunities across healthcare, finance, cybersecurity, and industrial safety; and (iv) a research agenda highlighting open challenges in scalable rule induction, co-adaptation between LLMs and EBRB, and evaluation of hybrid agents. Our goal is not to present empirical benchmarks, but to articulate a vision and roadmap for EBRB-enhanced agentic AI that is both powerful and trustworthy.
No comments yet — start the discussion below.