Dylan Slack, Sophie Hilgard, Emily Jia, Sameer Singh, Himabindu Lakkaraju · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society 2020 · 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3375627.3375830
Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).
As machine learning black boxes are increasingly being deployed in domains such as healthcare and criminal justice, there is growing emphasis on building tools and techniques for explaining these black boxes in an interpretable manner. Such explanations are being leveraged by domain experts to diagnose systematic errors and underlying biases of black boxes. In this paper, we demonstrate that post hoc explanations techniques that rely on input perturbations, such as LIME and SHAP, are not reliable. Specifically, we propose a novel scaffolding technique that effectively hides the biases of any given classifier by allowing an adversarial entity to craft an arbitrary desired explanation. Our approach can be used to scaffold any biased classifier in such a way that its predictions on the input data distribution still remain biased, but the post hoc explanations of the scaffolded classifier look innocuous. Using extensive evaluation with multiple real world datasets (including COMPAS), we demonstrate how extremely biased (racist) classifiers crafted by our framework can easily fool popular explanation techniques such as LIME and SHAP into generating innocuous explanations which do not reflect the underlying biases.
Last synced
Businesses 2026 · 0 citations
International Journal of Information Security 2026 · 0 citations
Научный журнал "Вестник Актюбинского регионального университета имени К Жубанова" 2026 · 0 citations
Unspecified venue · 0 citations
AI 2026 · 0 citations
GlobeIS International Journal of Global Information Systems 2026 · 0 citations
Journal of Chemometrics 2026 · 0 citations
No comments yet — start the discussion below.