Čedomir Stanojević · Leisure Sciences 2026 · 2026
DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2026.2723530
Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).
This paper examines the implications of artificial intelligence for human agency, free will, and leisure bridging philosophy, leisure scholarship, and science fiction. Drawing on thinkers from Kant and Kierkegaard to Sartre and de Beauvoir, alongside science fiction visionaries such as Asimov, Herbert, and Roddenberry, the essay argues that society is moving toward a hard deterministic framework in which algorithmic systems increasingly anticipate, narrow, and shape human choice. Key concerns include AI sycophancy, the erosion of cognitive independence, and the loss of individuality through algorithmic reductionism. The paper reframes imperfection as an essential marker of humanity, warning that the hyperproduction of polished AIgenerated content threatens authentic self-expression. Rather than rejecting technology, the paper serves as a humanistic call to preserve agency, value imperfection, and maintain the primacy of human-computer interaction over its inversion, ultimately asking whether AI will free us from the “condemnation” of agency and cognitive responsibility, or free us to just be, enabling genuine human flourishing and enlightenment.
No comments yet — start the discussion below.