Toni GIBEA, Radu Uszkai · AI & Society 2026 · 2026
DOI: 10.1007/s00146-026-03250-z
Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).
One of the main ethical reasons why autonomous vehicles (AVs) have been portrayed as the future of transportation is their potential to enhance road safety by eliminating human error. However, while AVs may mitigate known hazards, their successful deployment in the near future hinges on their performance in a mixed-traffic environment, where they must coexist and interact with human drivers. This paper adopts a broad Aristotelian virtue ethics framework to introduce the concept of driving phronesis as a normative framework for resolving nuanced, everyday coordination problems in traffic. Thus, our paper argues that a promising future for AVs is one in which they will function as digital duplicates of drivers in specific contexts, endowed with functional driving phronesis.
No comments yet — start the discussion below.