Brent Mittelstadt, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, Luciano Floridi · Big Data & Society 2016 · 2016
DOI: 10.1177/2053951716679679
Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).
In information societies, operations, decisions and choices previously left to humans are increasingly delegated to algorithms, which may advise, if not decide, about how data should be interpreted and what actions should be taken as a result. More and more often, algorithms mediate social processes, business transactions, governmental decisions, and how we perceive, understand, and interact among ourselves and with the environment. Gaps between the design and operation of algorithms and our understanding of their ethical implications can have severe consequences affecting individuals as well as groups and whole societies. This paper makes three contributions to clarify the ethical importance of algorithmic mediation. It provides a prescriptive map to organise the debate. It reviews the current discussion of ethical aspects of algorithms. And it assesses the available literature in order to identify areas requiring further work to develop the ethics of algorithms.
Last synced
ACM Computing Surveys 2026 · 0 citations
The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication 2026 · 0 citations
AI & Society 2026 · 0 citations
Religions 2026 · 0 citations
International Journal of Scientific Research in Science Engineering and Technology 2026 · 0 citations
Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society 2026 · 0 citations
MEDİAJ 2026 · 0 citations
Machine Learning Research 2026 · 0 citations
Discover Artificial Intelligence 2026 · 0 citations
No comments yet — start the discussion below.