Beyond Positive or Negative: Latent Profiles of University Students’ AI Attitude and Their Career-Development Correlates

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

Artificial intelligence (AI) can be appraised simultaneously as useful, capable, threatening, and demanding. Yet research typically treats attitudes toward AI as a single favorable-unfavorable continuum, obscuring how these evaluations coexist within individuals. Using a three-wave, time-lagged survey of 379 first-year university students in China, we examined configurations of six AI-related appraisal indicators: perceived humanlikeness, adaptability, and quality of AI; AI use anxiety; awareness of smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms (STARA) as a career threat; and AI creative self-efficacy. Latent profile analysis supported four profiles: Positive Empowerment (19.2%), Anxious Acceptance (37.5%), Low-Perception Detached (37.2%), and High-Perception High-Vigilance (6.1%). R3STEP models showed that learning agility, digital literacy, future work self salience, and perceived university digital support were prospectively associated with profile membership, particularly in distinguishing the Low-Perception Detached profile from the more engaged profiles. BCH comparisons further showed that the Positive Empowerment and High-Perception High-Vigilance profiles reported relatively high levels of both career crafting and self-perceived employability, whereas the Low-Perception Detached profile reported the lowest levels of both outcomes. Notably, the High-Perception High-Vigilance profile combined elevated AI use anxiety and STARA awareness with strong career-development engagement, while the Low-Perception Detached profile combined comparatively low threat perceptions with weak career crafting and employability. These findings demonstrate that higher AI-related threat was not necessarily associated with weaker career preparation and, conversely, that low perceived threat was not necessarily associated with greater adaptive readiness. Overall, the results position students’ responses to AI as configurations of opportunity appraisal, threat, and AI creative self-efficacy rather than as uniformly positive or negative attitudes, thereby highlighting the need for differentiated university career education and AI-readiness interventions.