API-TAIL: Detecting Model Substitution in LLM APIs through Temperature-Aligned Likelihood Tails

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

Commercial language model APIs return only text, allowing a provider to cut costs by quietly routing a fraction of user requests to a cheaper substitute model while billing for the advertised one. Detecting such partial substitution is challenging because honest providers also alter the output distribution through undocumented decoding and serving choices, such as temperature scaling, sampling truncation, repetition and presence penalties, and default system prompts, forcing an audit to test against a composite null of legitimate configurations rather than a single reference. Our key insight is that these legitimate variations primarily shift response typicality across the entire batch, whereas partial substitution injects individual responses that remain anomalous under the claimed model. Building on this, we introduce API-TAIL, a typicality audit that first absorbs batch-level shifts by aligning a single effective temperature to center standardized surprisal scores across the audited batch, and then flags the endpoint if the number of remaining tail responses exceeds a threshold calibrated across legitimate configurations. Evaluated on real-world commercial APIs, API-TAIL reliably controls false alarms across diverse honest providers while detecting even low-rate partial substitution with a small query budget, substantially outperforming existing rank- and MMD-based audits that lose detection power under the same composite calibration.

• Is Your LLM Relay Serving What It Claims? A low-cost and high-power test for LLM Relay Auditing

  arXiv (Cornell University) 2026 · 0 citations