Position Matters More Than Channel: Talking a Language Model Out of a Correct Answer

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

Language models now answer questions alongside other claims: a note in the system prompt, a message from another agent, their own earlier answer. We ask what it takes to talk a model out of an answer it gets right on its own, and separate three factors that earlier studies vary together: where the advice sits in the prompt, who is said to have written it, and what the model has already written. On Qwen3.5-27B and four-option MMLU-Pro items, with the rest of the advice held fixed in each comparison, we find three things. First, position matters far more than the API channel, in opposite directions for a bare claim and an argument: a bare "the answer is X" does most harm just before the model answers, while the same claim with a false rationale does most harm before the question, where it raises error on items the model otherwise almost never misses from 1% to 67%; moving the claim between the system message and the user message at the same position changes error by a few points. Second, attributing the note to an authority rather than to another participant, and phrasing it assertively, each raise error by 10-27 points, while the two authorities we tested differ by under two. Third, replaying a correct worked answer before the advice protects it whether the text is shown as the model's own or as someone else's, and the same replay keeps wrong answers from being corrected by a bare correct note. The position result replicates under an independently written prompt. Code, items and all result tables are released at https://github.com/coolkillercat/safety.

• When Models Defer to Wrong Answers: A Robustness Audit of Source-Attributed Cues in Multiple-Choice QA

  arXiv (Cornell University) 2026 · 0 citations

• Authority Bias in Language Models: Source Deference and User Agreement Are Not Interchangeable

  arXiv (Cornell University) 2026 · 0 citations