
Bogdan Sergienko · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2026 · 2026
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23683815
Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).
This exploratory Project BOG preprint investigates sparse semantic anchors as a method for open-ended scientific exploration rather than merely shortening or optimizing prompts. Three human-designed A/B problem pairs were examined, followed by two identical minimal instructions: "ВЫЧИСЛЕНИЯ" (Computations) and "МАТИМАТИКА ФОРМУЛА" (Mathematics Formula). The resulting conversations developed distinct conceptual trajectories. The anchor-oriented dialogue explored physical traces, adaptive networks, and possible computation through environmental change. The conventional-prompt dialogue developed systems for recording, verifying, and distributing calculations. These observations suggest a research question: can sparse semantic signals, interacting with conversational history, help language models explore unexpected conceptual directions that were not explicitly specified by the user? The study is exploratory and qualitative. Differences in initial conditions, context carryover, and inconsistencies in generated mathematical models prevent causal claims of superiority or scientific discovery. Supporting materials include selected prompt-response evidence and a qualitative comparison dataset. This work is not peer reviewed.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2026 · 0 citations
No comments yet — start the discussion below.