
Yaa Asantewaa Bediako, Kwadwo Osei Bonsu · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2026 · 2026
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23543469
Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).
Differential privacy is increasingly proposed as a safeguard for training triage models on community health registry data, yet its interaction with causal feature attribution and downstream fairness remains uncharacterised. The analysis treats the privacy budget as a design parameter that perturbs the joint distribution of features and outcomes, and derives bounds on the disparity in attribution ranks between protected and non-protected groups. A before-after-control-impact design is proposed to evaluate the framework, with operating characteristics characterised under a declared variance structure (between-cluster SD = 6.0, residual SD = 4.5, intraclass correlation = 0.64). Power was estimated across 2000 design cells for cluster counts of 8, 16, 24 and 32 and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points. The design achieves 80% power to detect a 5 percentage point effect with 54 clusters. The framework proposes that fairness estimation under differential privacy must account for attribution instability, and that the intraclass correlation of 0.64 implies that cluster-level randomisation is essential for credible inference. The contribution is a formalisation of the privacy-attribution-fairness trilemma and a design protocol for its empirical evaluation.
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society 2026 · 0 citations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2026 · 0 citations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2026 · 0 citations
No comments yet — start the discussion below.