Mayank Shekhar, Anil Sain · International Journal of Law Management & Humanities 2026 · 2026
DOI: 10.63108/ijlmh.13011
Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).
“The power of the algorithm lies not in what it shows, but in what it chooses to hide.” The digital public sphere has transformed from a neutral marketplace of ideas into a carefully curated arena, sculpted by algorithms, platform incentives, and the unpredictable tides of viral trends. As deepfakes, manipulated narratives, and manufactured trending content shape what the public sees and believes, the very bedrock of democratic discourse is put under pressure. In this shifting landscape, constitutional morality must reach beyond the boundaries of the State to confront the rising digital influence. This paper explores how algorithmic governance is reshaping the delicate balance between technology, truth, and constitutional values. It contends that algorithms are far from passive tools; they are powerful gatekeepers that decide who is seen, whose voices echo, and whose are silenced. Trending features can conjure a mirage of public consensus, while deepfakes and synthetic media dissolve the boundary between reality and fiction, threatening the foundations of informed citizenship and the integrity of elections. Taking a comparative lens, the paper explores how India, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and Australia are grappling with these digital dilemmas. The paper argues that constitutional morality must evolve to stay relevant in the algorithmic era. As digital platforms tighten their grip as arbiters of public conversation, the necessity to bring algorithmic power under democratic oversight grows ever stronger. Through this comparative analysis, the paper urges the creation of a more unified and principled framework to defend constitutional values in a world where truth can be manufactured and visibility manipulated.
No comments yet — start the discussion below.