Samuele Bortolotti, Weixin Chen, Han Zhao, Andrea Passerini, Stefano Teso, Antonio Vergari · arXiv (Cornell University) 2026 · 2026
Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).
Neuro-Symbolic (NeSy) predictors incorporate prior knowledge into the prediction process of neural networks, ensuring that outputs satisfy specified constraints, making them particularly suitable for high-stakes applications where compliance with domain knowledge is essential. A key bottleneck in this paradigm is the acquisition of symbolic constraints: encoding domain knowledge into logical formulas remains a manual and expert-intensive process. In this work, we investigate the extent to which auto-formalization via LLMs can systematically translate textual knowledge into symbolic knowledge that can be plugged into NeSy predictors. To this end, we introduce auto-nesy-bench, a new benchmark for evaluating constraint formalization and its impact on downstream accuracy of NeSy predictors. Through an extensive evaluation across several domains, we find that LLMs can formalize constraints to a meaningful extent, generating formulas that are often similar to those provided by human experts. Moreover, when the generated formulas are syntactically valid, they can lead to high-quality downstream predictions. The code and benchmark are available at https://unitn-sml.github.io/auto-nesy-bench/.
No comments yet — start the discussion below.