Aiden Kendriel · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2026 · 2026
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23107192
Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).
This discussion paper traces a rare intergenerational jurisprudential continuum within the Strachan-Davidson lineage. It places James Leigh Strachan-Davidson’s 1912 analysis of Roman magisterial imperium in direct dialogue with Craig Kyrle Strachan Davidson’s 2026 framework on epistemic decoupling and evidential grounding in UK public law. Despite being separated by more than a century and radically different technological contexts, both scholars diagnose the same constitutional pathology: the collapse of legal legitimacy when state authority is permitted to generate, execute, and verify its own factual reality. The paper further evaluates the meta-methodology of the modern Davidson research team, who openly deploy advanced computational models as a controlled intellectual utensil while maintaining strict human primacy. This dual approach—leveraging AI while simultaneously designing safeguards against its epistemic risks—positions their work as a foundational template for modern scholarship navigating the emerging “intellectual wild west” of AI-assisted research. By uniting Roman provocatio with the modern Duty of Evidential Grounding, the paper articulates a timeless constitutional maxim: authority is only lawful when it submits to verification by a reality it did not create.
No comments yet — start the discussion below.