Robust Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning from Corrupted Human Feedback

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

Reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) learns from human comparisons, which can be corrupted or deliberately manipulated. This paper studies online risk-sensitive RLHF with static conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) under adversarial preference-label flips. We consider additive linear rewards and a fixed-reference protocol with one comparison per episode and at most $C$ flipped labels over $K$ episodes. We propose weighted streamed-preference CVaR RLHF (WSP-CVaR-RLHF), which combines uncertainty-weighted reward estimation with optimistic augmented-state CVaR planning. For known transitions and normalized rewards, we establish the regret bound $\widetilde{O}\left(\frac{d}κ\sqrt{\frac{K}α}+\frac{dC}{κα}\right)$ up to lower-order terms, where $d$ is the reward-feature dimension, $α$ is the CVaR level, and $κ$ characterizes the preference link. The bound separates the clean statistical cost from the penalty caused by corrupted feedback. We further extend the analysis to unknown tabular transitions, where the trajectory distribution entering the CVaR objective must be learned together with the reward. We address the resulting coupled uncertainty using rectangular transition confidence sets, joint optimistic planning, and a history-level CVaR simulation argument. Experiments under four adversarial attacks demonstrate that WSP-CVaR-RLHF consistently reduces cumulative regret relative to its unweighted robust counterpart while preserving confidence-set coverage.