Masaki Hoshino · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2026 · 2026
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23071494
Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).
As AI takes over tasks traditionally assigned to junior employees, how can organizations preserve opportunities for people to develop professional judgment? This conceptual paper proposes treating AI as a junior employee and designing its on-the-job training (OJT) as an opportunity for human development. AI mistakes can become shared learning opportunities: experienced staff explain the reasoning behind corrections, junior staff participate in examining and correcting the work, and the resulting decision criteria inform subsequent tasks. Training AI can therefore also help train humans. The paper distinguishes organizational AI governance from task-specific instruction and supervision, then examines how they can operate together. It proposes four conditions for continuous AI OJT: understanding model and feature changes, reassessing existing operations, preserving objectives and critical requirements, and establishing stop criteria and accountability. Autonomous execution makes these conditions especially relevant when work continues after an important requirement has been lost. Drawing on the author’s AI Tuning framework, Open Bias Architecture (OBA), Stability Substitution Effect (SSE) and Operational SSE, the paper connects human development with the observation, correction and verification of AI-assisted work. It also emphasizes retaining operational knowledge in external records and procedures so that findings can be reused across tasks. Appendix A provides nine visual slides illustrating the central argument and proposed operational conditions. The complete document contains the six-page paper, an appendix title page and nine slides.
No comments yet — start the discussion below.