BIRD: Distilling Decision Boundaries into Rationales for MLLM Adaptation

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

Adapting general-purpose multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to specialized domains requires learning domain-specific decision criteria, which often hinge on subtle visual distinctions between otherwise plausible answers. Rationale augmentation aims to expose such evidence through additional observations or inter-sample comparisons, yet a visually valid cue is not necessarily decision-relevant: it may describe how samples differ without changing the model's relative preference between competing answers. We therefore introduce BIRD, a self-improving Boundary-Informed Rationale Distillation framework that uses model-specific confusions to locate unresolved local decision boundaries and distills the evidence that resolves these confusions into rationales. For each sample, BIRD retrieves candidate neighbors from the target MLLM's own representation space and selects the most confusable one according to its answer preferences. It then generates answer-blind candidate evidence from their visual differences and functionally verifies which evidence most effectively strengthens the model's preference for the correct answer while avoiding inappropriate transfer across the pair. The verified evidence is then distilled into a single-sample rationale for standard supervised fine-tuning. Experiments on medical and chart VQA show that BIRD outperforms competing rationale-augmentation methods across two target MLLMs, while further analyses demonstrate clearer separation of confusable answers and stronger gains from model-matched supervision.