Where Do Embodied Decisions Come From? Rethinking Latent and Explicit Reasoning

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning is increasingly incorporated into Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, yet it can degrade the performance of stronger embodied agents. We investigate this capability-dependent effect by distinguishing explicit reasoning from latent decision computation, i.e., perception-grounded computation that directly supports action prediction. Under the standard \textit{think-then-act} (TTA) paradigm, intervening on the generated CoT while fixing the visual input and model parameters causes a substantial performance collapse, with Navigation F1 dropping from 72.14% to 11.84%, demonstrating the strong influence of explicit reasoning on action generation. We then propose \textit{decide-then-explain} (DTE), which predicts actions before generating explanations, and introduce Visual Conditional Contribution (VCC) and Reasoning Conditional Contribution (RCC) to characterize the resulting decision process. Across autonomous driving and robotic manipulation, DTE consistently outperforms TTA and conventional \textit{no-CoT} baselines, while exhibiting greater reliance on perception-grounded computation. Further TTA-trained, DTE-inference experiments show that this benefit is not solely attributable to retraining under the new factorization. Our results suggest that for capable embodied agents, explicit CoT may be better used to shape decision computation during training rather than mediate action generation at inference time. Code: https://github.com/ocean-luna/openvla-decide-then-explain.