Fast Plans, Faithful Actions: Closing the Planning-Execution Gap in Hierarchical Vision-Language-Action Models

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

Hierarchical vision-language-action (VLA) systems consist of a high-level vision-language planner and a low-level action expert that generates continuous actions. This hierarchical design has practical value only if the planner can generate plans fast enough to meet real-time control requirements, and the resulting plans actually contribute to the generation of action. We study one such system, a waypoint hierarchy pipeline adapted from $π_{0.5}$, and find that neither requirement is satisfied. This baseline relies on token-level autoregressive decoding (Token-AR) to generate a waypoint plan, requiring 57 very expensive vision-language model (VLM) forward passes. However, we find that erasing the waypoint endpoints has little effect on task success. Two findings reveal the misalignment of planner-executor: the planner generates outputs at an excessively fine granularity, and the executor underuses plans as a control condition. We address the latency issue with waypoint-aligned block-autoregressive decoding (Block-AR), and plan underuse issue with normalized goal modulation (NGM), a layer-wise goal path constrained by phase gating and anti-shortcut training so that the waypoint influences action generation maintaining other signals. Our method reduces the maximum number of VLM forward passes from 57 to 8 on LIBERO, including one prefix prefill, and achieves an $8.7\times$ reduction in planning latency on a Rokae dual-arm robot. With normalized goal modulation and anti-shortcut training, Block-AR's success rate on LIBERO-Long increases from 91.0% to 96.2%, while its average success rate across the four suites increases from 95.85% to 98.45%. On three bimanual tasks with this robot, success rates remain comparable across methods.