An Analysis of Streaming Deep Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Continual Learning in Robotics

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

Over the course of a lifetime, robots may encounter novel scenarios unaccounted for in its original training that result in performance degradation. One common approach to mitigating this issue is to further grow the offline training dataset in hopes of producing a policy robust to these changes. In contrast, biological learning occurs moment-to-moment via a stream of experience, unlike the predominantly batch-based and offline nature of deep learning. Although recent works show the feasibility of stream-based deep reinforcement learning, where updates use only the latest experience, none have shown it to be a viable continual learning framework for adapting robotic policies to unseen changes. In this paper, we present the first analysis of streaming deep reinforcement learning for adaptive continual learning in robotics. In particular, we show that, following an initial pretraining phase, streaming deep RL can enable a robot to successfully adapt to unforeseen changes to itself, its environment, or goals. Our primary experiments within quadruped locomotion demonstrate that a deep neural network robotic policy with certain optimizers and plasticity loss mitigation techniques can successfully leverage domain task knowledge from its pretraining to quickly adapt online to diverse changes via stream learning, outperforming batch-based on-policy methods and improving task success rates by up to 90% over the pretrained policy. Furthermore, we perform additional evaluations on robotic manipulation tasks to determine if our previous observations extend to different robotic morphologies and scenarios. Our results show that the successes observed in quadruped locomotion can be partially realized in manipulation with stability and performance limitations. We conclude with a discussion on the limitations of our work and its implications for the future of continual robot learning.