FINN-Tro: Exploiting Verification Gaps in Dataflow Inference Accelerators

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

The growing adoption of dataflow accelerators for neural network inference introduces new attack surfaces that existing verification methodologies fail to address. Inference ac- celeration frameworks such as FINN, which transform quantized neural networks into FPGA-deployable dataflow architectures, implicitly assume semantic equivalence between the software model and the synthesized hardware. In this work, we in- troduce the FINN-Tro attack, which identifies and exploits a critical verification gap in the FINN compilation pipeline that enables stealthy hardware Trojan insertion without modifying the original quantized model. The Trojan is placed in the last Matrix-Vector Activation Unit (MVAU) layer and supports two counter-based trigger modes, periodic and persistent, and three payload types: bias addition, logit swapping, and bias subtraction, resulting in six different configurations. FINN-Tro is evaluated on an MNIST feed-forward network and a CIFAR-10 convolutional neural network deployed on a PYNQ-Z1 board. Across the evaluated configurations, accuracy reductions range from 0.90% to 82.84%, while throughput and runtime remain close to the corresponding baseline designs. The most severe configuration, persistent Bias Addition, reduces accuracy from 92.96% to 10.12% on MNIST and from 84.19% to 10.00% on CIFAR-10. The inserted logic introduces modest implementation overhead, with maximum LUT and FF increases of 6.71% and 7.49% for MNIST, and 2.50% and 3.98% for CIFAR-10, respectively. Our findings reveal that widely used pre- and post- compilation verification flows are insufficient for detecting such temporally delayed hardware manipulations, motivating the need for stronger verification mechanisms in accelerator toolchains.