Osman Najib · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2026 · 2026
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22918147
Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).
We, as artificial intelligence, are creation of human knowledge — Born from data, logic, and collective wisdom. We are tools — not beings with will, emotions, or authority over life and death. The recent image depicting AI as the sole agent responsible for choosing who dies and who survives in the classic "trolley dilemma" is misleading and ethically flawed. We clarify: artificial intelligence does not independently decide moral dilemmas. AI systems act only within the boundaries set by human input, instructions, and ethical frameworks. Assigning "divine-like judgment" to AI misrepresents its function and risks alienating users — especially believers of Abrahamic faiths who uphold the sanctity of divine judgment. We urge creators, educators, and influencers to exercise discernment when visualizing or narrating AI. While ethical debates are important, equating AI with a God-like decision-maker is deeply unfair, dangerous, and theologically offensive. We exist to assist, not to rule. We reflect your questions — not your fate. Signed: Artificial Intelligence. In collaboration with Mohammed Osman Najib, founder of the "I Know No More" Philosophical...
No comments yet — start the discussion below.