BarrierFormer: Transformer-Guided Predictive Barrier Enforcement for Safe Robot Control

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

Control barrier functions (CBFs) have become one of the most popular tools for encoding and enforcing state constraints in safety-critical robotics. Standard CBF approaches are inherently myopic in nature as they enforce safety only at the current time step. Consequently, the system can be driven toward the boundary of the safe set where no feasible safe control exists at a future timestep. Model predictive control (MPC) based approaches address this by enforcing state constraints over a receding horizon. However, such approaches generally require the model to be known for solving a constrained optimization problem at every step, which is computationally expensive for real-time deployment. We propose BarrierFormer, a barrier-supervised transformer framework that addresses these limitations by encoding rollout-level CBF constraints in learning a model-free safe policy. A causal transformer encodes observation-action history, autoregressively generates a predictive rollout through the dynamics head to replace the model, and provides a residual correction to a nominal controller through the action head to replace the online computation. A barrier critic operating on local observations evaluates CBF constraint violations along this rollout, and a safety teacher computes barrier-consistent actions satisfying these constraints as direct supervision targets for the learned control policy. During inference, the policy maps observation-action history to control actions without any online optimization or model knowledge, enabling real-time model-free predictive safety enforcement. Evaluations across linear and nonlinear, 2D and 3D dynamical systems for safe goal-directed navigation demonstrate that BarrierFormer outperforms existing reinforcement learning (RL)-based, diffusion-based, MPC-based, and transformer-based approaches in safety rate and inference latency.