The Illusion of Alignment Continuity

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

Agentic AI is expanding what artificial intelligence can execute with limited human supervision. As these capabilities scale, emerging approaches increasingly rely on permissions, operational constraints, monitoring, auditability, escalation, and selective human intervention to bound autonomous execution. This article examines a complementary challenge: human intent itself can evolve while agentic execution is underway. An AI agent may remain within its authorized boundaries, violate no guardrail, and continue executing competently while remaining anchored to an earlier version of human intent. The article introduces the concept of the Illusion of Alignment Continuity: autonomous execution appears to remain aligned because its actions are coherent, authorized, and within established boundaries, even as the authoritative human intent governing that execution has evolved. It distinguishes persistent memory from intent continuity and examines the architectural challenge of maintaining continuity between evolving human intent and increasingly autonomous AI reasoning and execution. The central question is: How do we scale autonomous execution while preserving alignment with human intent as that intent itself evolves?