Roman Briker, Katerina Gonzalez, Rouven Kanitz · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 2026 · 2026
DOI: 10.1177/00218863261490153
Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).
Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems are entering the workplace at an unprecedented pace, making the associated organizational change a unique challenge for senior leaders. Traditional change models assume controllability and sequential implementation. By contrast, agentic AI operates autonomously, and adoption often emerges through employee exploration, rendering established blueprints a limited guide. Conceptualizing top-down steering and bottom-up enactment as independent dimensions rather than opposing choices, we outline four prototypical approaches to agentic AI change: (1) light-touch drift, (2) grassroots experimentation, (3) command-and-scale, and (4) integrative change . Rather than pinpointing a superior strategy, we argue that senior leaders must continuously diagnose and rebalance their approach to fit their context. We call for treating agentic AI change not as a one-time implementation challenge but as the ongoing orchestration of an evolving portfolio of top-down and bottom-up processes. We close with directions for future research on the enactment, temporal patterns, and governance of agentic AI change.
No comments yet — start the discussion below.