Changbeen Kim, Junwon Chang, Kipyo Kim, Risa Shinoda, Kuniaki Saito, Donghyun Kim · arXiv (Cornell University) 2026 · 2026
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2609.21521
Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).
While Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs) have recently demonstrated strong performance, reliably evaluating their fine-grained video understanding remains challenging. Existing benchmarks often rely on question answering or ground-truth caption matching, where models may succeed through superficial cues and incomplete annotations. To this end, we introduce VidOmni-Bench, a benchmark that requires models to verify whether each event in dense video captions is supported by the video. VidOmni-Bench consists of 500 videos spanning five complexity types and diverse durations from 4 seconds to 90 minutes. After collecting videos along these axes, we use diverse Video-LLMs to generate dense captions and obtain human-verified sentence-level labels, where sentences containing incorrect events serve as hard negatives for evaluation. Our experiments on VidOmni-Bench reveal three key findings: (i) Video-LLMs frequently generate hallucinated descriptions in dense video captioning; (ii) they also struggle as verifiers, failing to reliably detect plausible but incorrect event descriptions; and (iii) model weaknesses vary across video complexity and duration, revealing diverse, model-specific bottlenecks in current Video-LLMs.
No comments yet — start the discussion below.