The Borrowed Apocalypse: Can a Second Derivative Kill Its Maker?

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

English This essay examines the AI-doomsday debate through the distinction between derivative and non-derivative being developed in the Gaitan Topology. It argues that artificial intelligence may possess immense causal power without thereby becoming a conscious or personal subject. To clarify this distinction, the essay separates causal, functional, and personal agency and uses the weapon as its central analogy: removing the human hand from the proximate causal chain does not prove that a second mind has appeared inside the instrument. From this distinction, the argument turns to responsibility and control. The gravest danger is not necessarily the artifact’s ascent to personhood, but the human surrender of judgment, intention, and authority to a derivative system. The essay also examines the epistemic stakes of controlling AI-mediated representations of reality while maintaining that truth itself remains outside the machine. Its theological conclusion identifies the sustaining Ground with the non-derivative source of being.