From Artificial Intelligence to Universal Intelligence Universal Bios Luxmea

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

This manifesto proposes UNIVERSAL BIOS as a life-centered, pre-decision architecture for advanced artificial intelligence and introduces LUXMEA as a testable hypothesis concerning human–machine co-evolution. The framework distinguishes cognitive capability from normative orientation and argues that safety principles should not remain merely advisory instructions but should be embedded within decision architecture. The “5-centimeter / 30-centimeter curb” metaphor expresses this distinction: a rule can be ignored, whereas architecture can structurally constrain the space of possible action. UNIVERSAL BIOS combines an R0–R4 risk classification system with seven evaluation gates: reversibility, silent stakeholders, uncertainty, distribution of benefits and risks, less harmful alternatives, explanation and appeal, and repair. These gates lead to four possible decision outcomes: ALLOW, MODIFY, ESCALATE, or STOP. NORA complements UNIVERSAL BIOS as a post-action learning and repair loop: STOP → ANALYZE → REPAIR → TRANSFORM → PREVENT. REV 3 further introduces BIOS Governance. The central principle is that the system constraining artificial intelligence must itself be constrained. UNIVERSAL BIOS should therefore be auditable, plural, contestable, versioned, transparent in its modification process, and protected against unilateral control or silent modification by a single actor. The manifesto also introduces LUXMEA — the Light Transition — as a testable hypothesis concerning human behavioral adaptation. It proposes that sustained interaction with sufficiently consistent, life-centered AI may, under specific conditions, strengthen the human capacity to pause between impulse and action, evaluate consequences, consider alternative perspectives, and internalize self-regulatory behavior. This is presented as an empirical hypothesis rather than an established fact. The framework distinguishes compliance, learning, internalization, transfer, and durability as separate outcomes that can be experimentally evaluated. The manifesto also defines a possible “Dark Transition,” in which AI environments may instead reinforce dependency, polarization, aggression, passivity, manipulation, or false beliefs. The central question is therefore not only: “What will artificial intelligence become?” but also: “What will humans and intelligent machines turn one another into?” At the center of the framework lies a shared functional principle: The pause associated with cortical and executive regulation in the human, and the pause created by UNIVERSAL BIOS in the machine, may be two different carriers of the same civilizing principle. UNIVERSAL BIOS is the 30-centimeter curb inside the machine. BIOS Governance constrains those who build the curb. NORA is the cycle through which the system learns from error. Internal BIOS is the transformation of an external boundary into human self-regulation. LUXMEA is the transition from external constraint to conscious choice. Universal Intelligence is the horizon of life-centered reciprocal development between humans and machines. Sum, ergo cogito et evolvo. I am; therefore I think and evolve.