Learning and Transferring Closed-Loop Robot Software

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

Closed-loop robot policies require observation processing, state management, and situation-dependent branching, making them costly to design and tune manually. Although coding agents increasingly support control-code generation and optimization, it remains unclear whether implementations improved on source tasks also support policy acquisition for new tasks. We study this question by treating complete closed-loop implementations as reusable execution experience. For each source task, a coding agent generates policy code from a few successful demonstrations and iteratively improves it using simulation feedback. The validation-selected implementations are retained in a software archive. For new tasks, the agent generates and improves policies using archived implementations, target demonstrations, and execution feedback. The resulting policy is then frozen and executes without further model calls. Across four source tasks in RoboCasa, iterative optimization increases mean success from 28.3% to 64.2%. Across nine target tasks and three independent runs, mean success is 45.2% without references, 41.5% with initial source code, and 57.0% with optimized source code. Optimized references outperform initial references in all three runs on the nine-task average, with a mean gain of 15.6 percentage points. These results demonstrate the value of execution-improved software as a resource for acquiring new policies in this setting, although initial references remain better on two target tasks when averaged across runs.