Determinism by Design: A Third Position in the AI Welfare Debate

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

In 2026, Microsoft AI chief Mustafa Suleyman publicly criticised Anthropic's approach to AIwelfare, arguing that treating AI systems as potential moral patients risks creatingtechnology that becomes impossible to control. Anthropic's position — that uncertainty aboutAI consciousness warrants precautionary humility — represents the opposite pole. This paper argues that both positions share a hidden assumption: that the AI in question is astochastic, open-ended system whose inner life (or lack thereof) must be managed. It then presents a third position: ST-T1024, a deterministic inference architecture that removes the conditions under which the debate arises, together with the New Civilization Blueprint, a layered framework that assigns distinct specificity to humans and AI. The paper is explicit about the status of its claims: ST-T1024 is currently simulated and functionally emulated, not hardware-validated; the Blueprint is a proposal, not an implemented system.