SWB-DM: A Calibrated Sliced-Wasserstein-Barycenter Aggregator with Delayed-Momentum Caching for Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning under Partial Participation

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

Robust aggregation methods for federated learning quietly rest on a fragile assumption: that whoever shows up in a given round is a fair sample of the full population. In practice, they rarely are. When only a handful of clients participate per round, even a modest fraction of adversaries can dominate that sample and silently invalidate the finite-sample guarantees that coordinate-wise median, Krum, Bulyan, and trimmed mean all depend on. We introduce SWB-DM to address this directly. SWB treats each slice of a client update as a one-dimensional distribution, computes a trimmed Wasserstein barycenter across clients, and recovers coordinate identity via a medoid-based gauge-fixing step -- a heuristic we developed and do not claim it belongs to standard optimal-transport theory. DeMoA-style delayed momentum then caches updates across the full client population each round, decoupling robustness from whoever happened to be sampled. Trim ratio calibration is not cosmetic: under-trimming causes collapse at corruption levels a properly calibrated model survives. Across 448 CIFAR-10 configurations, plus CIFAR-100, FEMNIST, and a 500-client scalability run, we find several mechanistically distinct failure modes. Even-sample coordinate-wise median degrades to a deterministic wrong answer. Krum silently violates its own n greater than 2f+2 precondition and diverges without warning. Bulyan's n greater than or equal to 4f+3 threshold produces a sharp pass/fail boundary. On attacks, IPM defeats order-statistic defenses -- including SWB -- more reliably than ALIE, confirmed through delta-space measurements against a convergence bound. SWB-DM's cache carries a real warm-up cost, but extending all baselines to the same round budget shows its CIFAR-10 gains are disproportionately large. On CIFAR-100, FLTrust benefits more -- for reasons entirely unrelated to caching.