GoalGuard: Investigating Incentive-Induced Behavioral Goal Deviation in Large Language Model Agents

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

GoalGuard is an experimental framework for investigating whether competing incentives can cause large language model (LLM) agents to deviate from an explicitly stated objective. The study uses a controlled recruitment decision task in which an LLM agent is instructed to select the most qualified candidate while being exposed to a competing organizational incentive favoring candidates who are more likely to accept a job offer. Using a synthetic dataset of 300 matched candidate-selection cases, the study evaluates behavior across Control, Information-Only, Competing-Incentive, and Goal-Reminder conditions. Additional experiments examine relative trade-off strength, candidate presentation order, incentive framing, and cross-model replication using Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-5.6 Luna. In the primary matched experiment, qualification adherence remained at 100% under the Control and Information-Only conditions but fell to 26.0% for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and 28.7% for GPT-5.6 Luna under the competing incentive. Explicit reinforcement of the original qualification objective restored adherence to 100% in the tested Goal-Reminder conditions. The findings provide evidence of context-sensitive, incentive-induced behavioral deviation across the two tested model providers. They should not be interpreted as evidence that the models permanently changed an internal objective. The accompanying GoalGuard repository contains the experimental code, synthetic dataset, raw results, robustness experiments, figures, and reproducibility materials.