Md. Amir Khusru Akhtar · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2026 · 2026
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22797078
Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).
Generative artificial intelligence can produce polished academic artifacts while leaving uncertain which learner capabilities those artifacts support. We formalize the resulting decision problem as the Certification–Assessment Resolution Gap (CARG): an assessment protocol may leave certification-relevant learner worlds observationally equivalent even though the intended credential requires different decisions. A necessary condition for universally correct certification is therefore that each assessment-equivalence class be homogeneous with respect to the certification rule. Building on this condition, we formulate the scientific foundation of Resolution-Based Education (RBE) as a conservative extension of outcome-based education: existing performance evidence is reused, additional burden is zero whenever current evidence is already resolution-adequate, and otherwise a finite adaptive policy seeks the least-burdensome admissible evidence needed to resolve the remaining decision. We formalize Resolvable Capability Outcomes, distinguish one-step discriminating probes from complete Minimum Resolution-Restoring Perturbations, define positive resolved attainment and explicit AR/AU/RN/NA/Deferred states, and derive course- and programme-level metrics including RNR. Reproducible tests include deterministic and probabilistic mechanisms, a policy-tree case, 20,000 Monte Carlo episodes, and retrospective analysis of 32,593 Open University student-module records. Falsification controls reject a broad predictive-superiority claim. The surviving empirical result is narrower: under the declared retrospective proxy setup, selective adaptive acquisition reduces evidence burden while strong fixed-confidence controls remain competitive on risk.
No comments yet — start the discussion below.