Intention-like representations in language models?

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

A growing chorus of AI researchers and philosophers posit internal representations in large language models (LLMs). But how do these representations relate to the kinds of mental states we routinely ascribe to our fellow humans? While some research has focused on belief- or knowledge-like states in LLMs, there has been comparatively little focus on the question of whether LLMs have intentions . I survey five properties that have been associated with intentions in the philosophical literature, and assess two candidate classes of LLM representations against this set of features. The result is mixed: current evidence suggests that LLMs have representations that are intention-like in many—perhaps surprising—respects, but they differ from human intentions in important ways. Deciding whether to classify these representations as intentions will require careful consideration of the costs and pay-offs of extending the concept beyond the paradigm human case.