Abdication to AI: Leadership AI Literacy as the Difference Between Governing and Being Governed by AI

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

As leaders increasingly rely on AI to make decisions and shape their reasoning, a risk emerges that their judgment is gradually replaced by AI output without their awareness, even while they remain accountable for the outcome. I refer to this challenge as abdication to AI and argue that it emerges from combining the convincing prose of generative AI with the well-established practice of delegating expertise, itself a vital leadership competency. As leader judgment is gradually supplanted by AI “reasoning” throughout an organization, eventually no human reasoning remains. Because these changes are small and accumulate invisibly, they cannot be easily verified by either leaders or technical staff, creating organizational change without a clear owner. The remedy is not to delegate the details to AI specialists but to develop AI literacy in leaders themselves, the difference between an organization that governs its AI and one that is unknowingly governed by it.