AnnoSketch: Evaluating and Collecting Human Sketches for MLLM-assisted Chart Annotation

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

As multimodal large language models (MLLMs) support a growing range of input modalities, increasing work explores how to incorporate rough sketches to convey user intent. For annotated chart generation, it remains unclear what annotation sketches people provide and when such visual input helps MLLMs generate more useful annotations. In this study, we examine when sketch input is useful for MLLM-generated chart annotations across variation in chart type and caption type. In addition, we qualitatively analyze participants' explanations of their output preferences to characterize what made generated annotations more or less helpful. To further document participants' annotation sketches, we present AnnoSketch, comprising 1,600 annotation sketches collected across 160 chart-caption pairs from the conditions in which sketch guidance proved most beneficial, together with participants' annotation intents, perceived comprehension difficulty, and self-reported expressive limitations. We also label these sketches with structured metadata describing how each sketch relates to its caption and how participants express annotations through visual marks. Together, our study and AnnoSketch help determine when to solicit sketch input and provide empirical source for how people sketch chart annotations to support captions. The dataset and supplemental materials are available in our OSF repository.