Will AI save ethics—and make ethicists obsolete?

Counts differ because each database indexes a different set of publications. We treat OpenAlex as the canonical count; Google Scholar is not shown (no API, and crawling it violates its ToS).

In 1982, Stephen Toulmin famously argued that medicine “saved the life of ethics.” This article asks whether AI is now doing something similar—and finds that the answer splits. Working from a broadly Toulminian conception of ethics as a discipline that responds to societal demand for normative orientation by providing analyses and reasoned recommendations, the article develops its argument in two stages. The first is diagnostic. AI is undeniably revitalizing ethics: it generates unprecedented demand for normative orientation and brings ethical questions to the center of public and academic debate. Yet AI appears to be on a trajectory toward becoming increasingly capable of supplying the very outputs for which ethicists have traditionally been consulted. If it can provide these outputs faster, more cheaply, and, in some respects, better, demand for ethics and demand for ethicists may increasingly come apart: ethics as a discipline may flourish even as ethicists as a profession face the prospect of becoming obsolete. In light of this diagnosis, the second stage asks how ethicists might respond. Four strategies are reconstructed: (1) defense and counterattack, (2) adaptive specialization, (3) ethics as an activity, and (4) cooperative transformation. Each strategy is critically assessed, culminating in a reflective appraisal of their respective strengths and limitations. The article concludes by arguing that ethicists must fundamentally reconsider the nature of their expertise and the role they can still claim for themselves in an age increasingly shaped by AI.